| Print this page |
You are all fundamentalists with a top dressing of science. That is why you are the stupidest of conservatives and reactionists in politics and the most bigoted of obstructionists in science itself. When it comes to getting a move on you are all of the same opinion: stop it, flog it, hang it, dynamite it, stamp it out. |
|
The so called Jihadi Muslims are fanatics who have obscured traditions and take liberty in interpreting |
Fundamentalism as an organized, conservative movement developed in US out of a series of Bible conferences in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The conferences were called by members of various denominations who strongly objected to the following: the historical-literary study of the Bible, known as higher criticism (see Biblical Scholarship); attempts to reconcile traditional Christian beliefs and doctrines with contemporary experience and knowledge; and acceptance of a scientific view of the world, particularly the theory of evolution. |
| The enemies of Islam even set up fake Islamic organizations to
preach for conquest of the world by Khilafa movement and by spreading literature
of hate and extremism
and create political instability in Egypt, Algeria etc. The ulterior motive is to alienate the Muslims from form US and the Western world. How far they succeeded is evident from the following quote: "We know that this mad dog of the Middle East has a goal of a world
revolution, Muslim fundamentalist revolution, which is targeted on many
of his own Arab compatriots and where we figure in that I don't know."
The emergence of MMA and other Jihadi organizations in Pakistan is being viewed by the Western Media as rise of fundamentalism. There is no slide towards fundamentalism in Pakistan in the real sense of the word. Even MMA which is a shaky alliance of several Islamic political parties are committed to democracy and the rule of law and the constituition. They have been able to seize power only in NWFP mainly becuase the people were disillusioned by the misrule and bad performance of PPP and PML (Nawaz) Government and like most other Muslims in other parts of the world they resent pro-Israeli policies of the Western countries specially after annexation of Jerusalem as capitol of Israel. The bid of MMA Government to enforce certain despotic laws has raised
eye brows in all segment of population as the over-whelming majority wants
to see Pakistan as a modern,
On the other hand Hindu fundamentalism is on rise in India and it is
more dangerous than Christian or Islamic fundamentalism as in a recent
rally in India VHP leaders declared that it is the Holy duty of Hindus
to to kill and finish off the Muslims scattered across India. They said
that Muslims breed like rabbits and their population would soon overtake
that of the Hindus. Until now, we Hindus had been moderate in our demands
but now
Acharya Dharmendra said: 'Muslims can continue to live here only provided
they all become Hindus' In this land of Shivaji, we should all follow Shivaji's
example and finish off all the descendants of Afzal Khan just as Shivaji
did.'
|
|
| After September 11th tragedy, anti-Islamic feelings have been brewing
in the United States and have been fanned by the old enemies of Islam.
In view of multi-fold increase in racial attacks the US Congress has recently
condemned the attacks on Muslims and people of Middle East and Asian origins
who live and work there and many are US citizens.
America is the most developed country not only in industrial and technological
fields but also in education, art and literature. The importance that is
attached in their own country on justice, multiculturalism, freedom
of speech etc. are admirable. Despite over 90% literacy rate the development
of petty and unrealistic prejudices in some segments of population in supposedly
most liberal and and most developed secular societies is not surprising
because of inherent weaknesses in human nature. Moreover the American
The fact is that before 1950 America used to be the most popular country
in the Muslim world. But after 1950 anger and frustration has been
developing due to imperious foreign policies ignoring the principles of
democracy and justice just to serve the selfish ends
Many American intellectuals have been critical of such unrealistic Foreign policies but their voice does not reach the American masses in the din of rhetoric of selfish politicians. For instance Noam Chomsky, U.S. linguist, political analyst has plainly ascribed the terrorist attacks on US as the reaction to imperious foreign policy. "U.S. international and security policy … has as its primary goal the preservation of what we might call "the Fifth Freedom," understood crudely but with a fair degree of accuracy as the freedom to rob, to exploit and to dominate, to undertake any course of action to ensure that existing privilege is protected and advanced."
|